mouse monoclonal anti cdc27 apc3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Mouse Monoclonal Anti Cdc27 Apc3, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 177 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti cdc27 apc3/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 177 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "CCT5 maintains mitotic fidelity and promotes early colorectal tumorigenesis"
Article Title: CCT5 maintains mitotic fidelity and promotes early colorectal tumorigenesis
Journal: iScience
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115223
Figure Legend Snippet: CCT5 maintains the structural integrity of the MCC-APC/C complex and facilitates APC/C activation (A) Co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) analysis of CDC20-associated proteins follows release from double thymidine block. CDC20 was immunoprecipitated, and the association of mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) components, including BUBR1, CDC27, BUB3, and MAD2L1, was examined by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots from n = 3 independent biological experiments are shown (n represents independent experiments). Reduced association of MCC components with CDC20 was observed in CCT5-depleted cells. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) analysis of APC/C-associated proteins follows release from double thymidine block. APC3 was immunoprecipitated, and the association of MCC components, including BUBR1, CDC27, CDC20, BUB3, and MAD2L1, was examined by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots from n = 3 independent biological experiments are shown (n represents independent experiments). Reduced association of MCC components with the APC/C complex was observed in CCT5-depleted cells, while input protein levels remained comparable. (C and D) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay shows reduced stability of CDC20 in CCT5-deficient HCT116 cells. Representative immunoblots are shown in (C). Quantitative densitometric analysis of CDC20 protein levels normalized to GAPDH and expressed relative to the 0-h time point is shown in (D). Experiments were performed in n = 3 independent biological replicates (n represents independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA (group × time) followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (E) RT-qPCR analysis of CDC20 mRNA expression follows CCT5 knockdown in HCT116 cells. No significant change in CDC20 mRNA levels was observed. Experiments were performed in n = 3 independent biological replicates (n represents independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. ns, not significant. (F) Cell viability assay assesses whether CDC20 overexpression rescues the proliferation defect induced by CCT5 knockdown in HCT116 cells. Experiments were performed in n = 3 independent biological replicates (n represents independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA (group × time) followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. CDC20 overexpression did not restore proliferation in CCT5-depleted cells. (G and H) Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle distribution in HCT116 cells follows CCT5 knockdown and CDC20 overexpression. Representative histograms are shown in (G). Quantification of the G2/M fraction is shown in (H). Experiments were performed in n = 3 independent biological replicates (n represents independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for the G2/M fraction was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, not significant. CDC20 overexpression did not restore the G2/M phase distribution in CCT5-depleted cells. (I and J) Ubiquitination assay shows increased CDC20 ubiquitination following CCT5 knockdown in HCT116 cells under asynchronous conditions (nocodazole −, MG132 +). CDC20 was immunoprecipitated, and ubiquitinated CDC20 was detected by immunoblotting with anti-ubiquitin antibodies (I). Quantitative densitometric analysis of ubiquitinated CDC20 normalized to immunoprecipitated CDC20 is shown in (J). Experiments were performed in n = 3 independent biological replicates (n represents independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using an unpaired t test. ∗∗ p < 0.01. (K and L) Ubiquitination assay shows reduced CDC20 ubiquitination following CCT5 knockdown in HCT116 cells under nocodazole-induced mitotic arrest conditions (NOC +, MG132 +). CDC20 was immunoprecipitated and ubiquitinated. CDC20 was detected by immunoblotting with anti-ubiquitin antibodies (K). Quantitative densitometric analysis of ubiquitinated CDC20 normalized to immunoprecipitated CDC20 is shown in (L). Experiments were performed in n = 3 independent biological replicates (n represents independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using an unpaired t test. ∗ p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Blocking Assay, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Knockdown, Two Tailed Test, Viability Assay, Over Expression, Flow Cytometry, Ubiquitin Proteomics

